On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:23:54PM -0500, William Giokas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:07:31PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:00:06PM -0500, William Giokas wrote: > > > Moved zsh shell completion to shell-completion/zsh/_systemd for > > > automake's sake. Also allow users to specify where the files should go > > > with:: > > Makes sense, imho. Should we go one step further and split _systemd > > like the bash completions were split? This would have at least the > > advantage that people packaging a subset of systemd could package > > a subset of completion scripts. > > Sorry, replied off list first. > > Originally this was there just to have the make install put zsh > completion files in the right place. I would be open to doing this, > however there are quite a few shared functions between commands, and as > I have been told, there isn't really a good way to source or store the > shared functions. I'm still going to try, but I make no promises.
I take back what I just said. All that really stands out is the -H
completion, and that is just a few lines that I don't feel bad about
having in all of the files. Currently I have 13 different files::
_hostnamectl
_journalctl
_localectl
_loginctl
_machinectl
_systemctl
_systemd
_systemd-analyze
_systemd-coredumpctl
_systemd-inhibit
_systemd-nspawn
_timedatectl
_udevadm
with _systemd being the kind of 'fallback' option, containing the
systemd commands that are less complex, and don't require as much in the
way of functions (most simply use 'flag:desc:(a b c)' or some such).
Thanks,
--
William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/
GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF
Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgpANqVtnodp6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
