On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Michal Sekletar <msekl...@redhat.com> wrote: > --- > TODO | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/TODO b/TODO > index ead699c..884acd6 100644 > --- a/TODO > +++ b/TODO > @@ -2,11 +2,6 @@ Bugfixes: > * the running hwdb seems not to pick up updated database files without > an explicit: udevadm control --reload > > -* enabling an instance unit creates pointless link, and > - the unit will be started with getty@getty.service: > - $ systemctl enable getty@.service > - ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service' > '/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@.service'
Did we find out why we ended up with getty@getty? Why the (missing) instance was filled with the unit name? Was that a hidden bug that needs to be fixed? Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
