-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 19.08.2013 13:25, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > Am 19.08.2013 11:58, schrieb Harald Hoyer: >> On 08/19/2013 11:21 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >>> Am 19.08.2013 10:34, schrieb Harald Hoyer: >>>> Hmm, the naming "luks.options" is IMHO poorly chosen. >>>> "options" as an option name... hmm. Also crypttab can contain >>>> more encryption modes, than LUKS.
Another remark: The option "luks.crypttab" already affects other schemes than luks - it is a generic option that can disable reading of crypttab altogether. Having an option 'crypttab=' even seems more confusing now. What do you think we should do? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSElZIAAoJEChPw0yOSxolzbMP/1DnmmhYtHAyq8koFZbWpsk6 JVWnZnhQrU7Y/QZJyvapWt/dnQY9MOgXzc6s49HE09A40qyLs2WYHM1dXKlx8B5N N9Q5V07xmD0WKbTNztmoIBLouUPv+NzfvF+2HoN+XwVcAuCmU9BV/HLG6V90aI+y 5Eh0pDTO1jFyL7Rhcf81MJus462POJSciLXZOTnXHDDm/42gg3McfT6x+xlcQh1T +aYsLao9Tg9iYXxi0/+LL8Z6KPELAeeaspIZllXa3tYSL6q233cPrqdkxtvCwZFc HMOY65usWNppjrzW9EM554dcoDsQ6iBII2ORPAQiMJnSJgaVUTWgmw5AJKNLAeRS X6SKf9STQtDSPpEpyyHNn4pl2wMW+olJ1VgU1s+NNgjw9ryRt04e/iD3cNHbCecI CnXFjDUbXM5aGef4OIk7hzK2CraOcFXagHzgUTF0HCxQLeNrnLwIsqtErnCAfLOL 7rNdwn2rbZfW278dT9A1LVDjNXYk9FwMaHBbQpIsuQSuhn9geU2LKOqBd9LWYzff KaPLg4O81H1Lb+JNduQKrRSN6ZCTkfSvjI/1/2Ro7hXK2hEbvX5doU94pfRJuPrn Yz50SEVNiGpWxmdoY+ADmJ1RSAHJ8gQgtRGki7AF2aE1Cj07f5uES/H/PCWbdvw6 OC1onClOzAw6OELeDHgt =a2Ge -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
