On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 06/11/13 02:08 did gyre and gimble: >> alright, I'll comment, but it took me 5 minutes to clear the coffee >> off my monitor... >> >> Looking at the feature list, why are you not contributing to connman >> instead? > > AFAIK, Tom has had plenty discussions with Marcel and Daniel on the > connman side. I actually made sure Tom met Daniel in Edinburgh a couple > weeks ago for this reason!
I guess I'm at fault for not attending those conferences ... > So I don't think you need to worry too much about conman vs. > systemd-networkd rather think of it as a rather collaborative effort in > general. Quite where all the code and shared bits live in the end I > don't know but I think this process is going about things "in the right > way" to come to a good end-solution. Sorry if my post seemed out of line - I'm happy to see the thread here with comments from everyone that answer my concern and questions, and knowing that this was well coordinated now makes me quite positive about this effort. Marcel and me have certainly struggled with the problem that happens when you attempt to bring connman into a more server-like environment, so, I'm very pleased to see that there is a significant effort to bring an appropriate solution in this space that actually involves connman as well. Thanks! Auke PS Marcel - Now we just need to figure out what to do with that JavaScript engine for pacrunner and get it working ;^) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel