On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:33:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 17.12.13 21:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:30:35PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Hmm, but that sounds like we should "grey" it out, no? The same way we > > > have a way to highlight things maybe we want the opposite as a way to > > > deemphasize things and color it grey in some way? (Not sure though > > > whether there's a nice grey in the ANSI color range?) > > I tried with light gray and dark gray first. The first one was too light on > > light background, and the second one blended in too much with other text. > > Hmm, but we have 256 color terminals nowadays, right? (I remember this > being a Fedora change recently). Maybe we can find some nice grey from > that increased range that works both on black and on whit backgrounds? Yeah, I though about that. In general I would like to add a bit more colors to journalctl output. We'd have to test $TERM though, since not every terminal can be expected to support 256c.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
