On Wed, 19.02.14 16:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > > How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably > > compiled in? (I think this is the moment to create the pattern). > Why not? It would be rather constraining for a distribution which wants > to support more than one. systemd should just perform the steps necessary > for all compiled frameworks compiled in, silently ignoring failures coming > from missing frameworks. Yes, I agree fully with Zbigniew. A distribution like Debian is likely to enable support for AppArmor, SMACK and SELinux in systemd, all at the same time. That doesn't mean that all three will be active together during runtime, as the kernel doesn't support that, however the binary we build should support all three, and what is used is decided at runtime at the discretion of the admin. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
