It was <2014-02-19 śro 16:05>, when Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably >> compiled in? (I think this is the moment to create the pattern). > Why not? It would be rather constraining for a distribution which wants > to support more than one. systemd should just perform the steps necessary > for all compiled frameworks compiled in, silently ignoring failures coming > from missing frameworks.
Hmm... silent ignoring makes things hard to debug. The most robust way for systemd is: 1) to check in runtime which frameworks are supported, 2) to attempt an action for every one of them, 3) to return an error if ANY of the actions fail. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpiM2yv81AYx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
