On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John <jstj...@purdue.edu> wrote: > "init.debug" would be better than "systemd.debug", in my opinion. It > is shorter (less typing and no possible end-user confusion over > "systemd.debug" vs. "system.debug"), and it is init-agnostic. Other > init systems (OpenRC, Upstart, etc.) would be able to add their own > support for this, if they want, without requiring an init-specific > kernel parameter. > > It just seems a lot simpler this way.
It would be a little odd given how "systemd.<name>" is how other probably portable options get namespaced. Arguably, systemd.log_level would become init.log_level. I'm not against it, but it couldn't be just init.debug. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
