It was <2014-06-01 nie 07:52>, when Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 30.05.14 12:45, Piotr Wilczek (p.wilc...@samsung.com) wrote: > >> This patch adds posibility for journal to get process data from >> socket data (if available) instead of from procfs. >> >> Additionally a new procinfo structure is added to store all process >> data in single place. This data include creditentials and status. >> >> To enable this functionality, SO_PASSPROC socket option must be set. >> This option is introduced in: >> http://lwn.net/Articles/600564/ > > I really *love* this work! It would be fantastic if we could get this done. > > Hmm, I am not seeting that SO_PASSPROC is actually turned on in this > patch? Am I missing something? This really needs to be an option that > can be turned on from the sending side, otherwise it would be only half > as useful...
"sending side"? Do you mean a daemon have to turn it on? IMHO it is systemd's job to set up a socket for service to log to, or journald's job to "request" this info to be passed to it. What am I missing? -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpnM0VwgO2tV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
