> -----Original Message----- > From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 1:13 PM > To: Piotr Wilczek > Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kyungmin Park; Juho Son; > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] journald: collect process data > from socket data > > On Mon, 02.06.14 12:56, Piotr Wilczek (p.wilc...@samsung.com) wrote: > > > > > On 06/01/2014 07:52 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > >On Fri, 30.05.14 12:45, Piotr Wilczek (p.wilc...@samsung.com) wrote: > > > > > >>This patch adds posibility for journal to get process data from > > >>socket data (if available) instead of from procfs. > > >> > > >>Additionally a new procinfo structure is added to store all process > > >>data in single place. This data include creditentials and status. > > >> > > >>To enable this functionality, SO_PASSPROC socket option must be > set. > > >>This option is introduced in: > > >>http://lwn.net/Articles/600564/ > > > > > >I really *love* this work! It would be fantastic if we could get > this done. > > > > > >Hmm, I am not seeting that SO_PASSPROC is actually turned on in this > > >patch? Am I missing something? This really needs to be an option > that > > >can be turned on from the sending side, otherwise it would be only > > >half as useful... > > > > > I turn this option in a separate patch, that I will post when the > > kernel patch is accepted. For now I wanted to know opinions about > this > > patch. > > In case this wasn't clear: the patch for systemd looks pretty OK. I'd > love to merge something like this, but of course we need the kernel > support first. If you can make this happen, I'd be delighted.
Thanks, I'm working on that and will let you know when ready. Piotr > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel