On Fri, 13.06.14 16:41, Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote:

> From: arvidj...@gmail.com
> 
> will terminate emergency.service due to implicit dependencies on basic.target
> and therefore sysinit.target which in turn conflict with
> emergency.target.

I am not entirely sure how emergecny.service should have been reached
with syslog.socket in place? isolate should not have left it around?

> 
> ---
>  units/emergency.service.in |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git units/emergency.service.in units/emergency.service.in
> index 94c090f..59f7cda 100644
> --- units/emergency.service.in
> +++ units/emergency.service.in
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>  Description=Emergency Shell
>  Documentation=man:sulogin(8)
>  DefaultDependencies=no
> -Conflicts=shutdown.target
> +Conflicts=shutdown.target syslog.socket
>  Before=shutdown.target
>  
>  [Service]


Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to