On Fri, 20.06.14 20:51, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I am not entirely sure how emergecny.service should have been reached > > with syslog.socket in place? isolate should not have left it around? > > > > commit 80cfe9e163b1c92f917e0a5e053b148fca790677 > Author: Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <t.bub...@reinform.de> > Date: Fri May 4 10:32:47 2012 +0200 > > Do no isolate in case of emergency or severe problems
Ah, indeed! Hmm, not sure what to do then, both goals are mutally incompatible: either we don't isolate, and then risk that running some commands will trigger the substantial amount of code. Or we isolate and then things are much harder to debug, because the system is gone... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
