2014-06-23 16:49 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > On Tue, 10.06.14 19:17, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Ronny Chevalier >> <chevalier.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > It was forgotten in b1e90ec515408aec2702522f6f68c4920b56375b >> > >> > See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79582 >> >> Applied. > > I reverted this a while back btw, as this actually made all tools check > for "quiet", not just the two PID 1 binaries. > > While "debug" is something that should have an effect to all systemd > binaries, "quiet" should not. It should only turn off output off things > that end up on the boot screen. Hence it is wrong to check for "quiet" > at the same place as "debug". Yes, seems logic.
> > Note that the log level and target is explicitly passed to the shutdown > binary via the command line, hence I don't really understand why the > patch was needed in the first place? Ronny, can you elaborate? It was needed because the quiet argument from the kernel cmdline was not being taken into account during shutdown, so multiple messages appeared, while the NEWS for v206[0] is mentioning that systemd honours the quiet argument also during shutdown. I did not check if there are messages appearing during shutdown now that you reverted the patch. [0] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/NEWS?id=v206#n77 Ronny _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
