2014-06-23 17:21 GMT+02:00 Ronny Chevalier <chevalier.ro...@gmail.com>: > 2014-06-23 16:49 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: >> On Tue, 10.06.14 19:17, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Ronny Chevalier >>> <chevalier.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > It was forgotten in b1e90ec515408aec2702522f6f68c4920b56375b >>> > >>> > See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79582 >>> >>> Applied. >> >> I reverted this a while back btw, as this actually made all tools check >> for "quiet", not just the two PID 1 binaries. >> >> While "debug" is something that should have an effect to all systemd >> binaries, "quiet" should not. It should only turn off output off things >> that end up on the boot screen. Hence it is wrong to check for "quiet" >> at the same place as "debug". > Yes, seems logic. > >> >> Note that the log level and target is explicitly passed to the shutdown >> binary via the command line, hence I don't really understand why the >> patch was needed in the first place? Ronny, can you elaborate? > It was needed because the quiet argument from the kernel cmdline was > not being taken into account during shutdown, so multiple messages > appeared, while the NEWS for v206[0] is mentioning that systemd > honours the quiet argument also during shutdown. > > I did not check if there are messages appearing during shutdown now > that you reverted the patch. Ok so I checked and the quiet argument is honored.
> > [0] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/NEWS?id=v206#n77 > > Ronny _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
