Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> schrieb: >> IMHO both xfs and btrfs should just not ship a fsck helper at all, not >> even as a symlink. This workaround made sense at some point, but now I >> believe both systemd _and_ fsck itself can deal gracefully with a >> missing fsck helper. > IMHO, this shows that using fstab-generator to shortcuit the whole > discussion who is right and what is the "proper" way to say that the fs > should not be checked seems like a good idea ;)
Reading your diff to the man page of systemd-fsck@.service suggests that systemd-fsck was designed to be filesystem agnostic. With your patch, it no longer is. ;-) BTW: I cannot see that part of the diff in the current git. :-? Just my two cents, don't take as criticism. -- Replies to list only preferred. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
