On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:23:39PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: [snip] > The nicer option appears to me is to talk to xfs and btrfs upstream and > ask them to either change their fsck to a symlink to /bin/true or to > remove it altogether. Because otherwise we cannot detect whether fscking > is actually necessary. I'd just reassign all bug reports popping up to > their respective utilities asking them to fix this, and giving us a > sane API to detct wether fsck is necessary or not. And that sane API > should be to to install that symlink or nothing at all. Installing nothing at at all or a symlink to /bin/true increases the burder on the fs developers, because now they have to make an additional effort to educate people what it means. I just don't see that happening.
But seems I'm the only one who likes the patch, let's forget about it. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
