On Tue, 30.09.14 14:44, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (gustavo.barbi...@intel.com) wrote:
> > systemd-timesyncd is ~400kb. Other binaries aren't too big > > either. Splitting everything up complicated things, and I'm not convinced > > that this is a useful change. > > indeed they are not big per se, but see my other email about tmpfiles, > they contribute to a misinterpretation of systemd. since they are > optional I want to make that clear and help the user to choose. > > I do have a complete set of packages for yocto that generates that > nicely and the final system size difference is huge: 7.5 to 30Mb > (whole system, not just systemd, but the dependencies, etc -- in > contrast sysvinit + busybox is 6.5Mb). > > as I wrote in the other email, I'll make sure that some packages are > highly recommended (ie: journal, udev, sysctl...), but forcing We don't support builds without journal or udev. We simply don't. > everyone to ship a ntp client (timesyncd) is asking for trouble when > people analyze systemd x options. Yes, timesyncd should definitely be optional, and so should resolved, that's true. I'd be OK with splitting those out on tmpfiles/sysusers, but would really prefer this to be done via m4, rather than in seperate files. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
