On Mon, 27.10.14 16:31, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2014-10-27 16:21 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > >> Sounds all fine, I would prefer though to use --usr-only or > >> --system-only, something a little bit more descriptive than just > >> --vendor though. The hwdb data is full ov "vendor" strings and it > >> sounds too confusing to me. > > > > I'd prefer "--usr" then for this. It's short, and descriptive. The > > "-only" suffix probably creates more confusion than clears things up, > > hence I'd avoid that. > > Keep in mind, that with split-usr, the hwdb files are in /lib/udev/hwdb > > So --usr would be confusing/misleading.
Well, I think that's OK really. We want to stay compatible with split-usr distros, but that kind of setup is really not at the focus of what we design for. I still think this should be named --usr. After all, moving those files away from /etc doesn't really make sense on split-/usr systems anyway, as it wouldn't help monopolizing vendor data in /usr really... Or at least I think the --usr stuff is really about monopolizing vendor data in /usr, and if you have a split-/usr system then that goal is moot anyway... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
