Hi On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ray Strode <halfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:53 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I had that change locally, but didn't push it because vconsole is >> optional. Thus, this rule must be optional, too. I'm now digging into >> autoconf+m4 to see how to do this... but I'm getting nowhere so far... > > Well you could: > > 1) rename 99-systemd.rules.in to 99-systemd.rules.in.in and then add > it to AC_CONFIG_FILES in configure.ac and add substitution variable to > 99-systemd.rules.in.in that expands to the empty string when > ENABLE_VCONSOLE isn't set and the udev rule when it is set. I don't > like that though, it would mean separating the udev rule from the > file. > > 2) Alternatively, you could leave 99-systemd.rules.in as is and hack > SED_PROCESS stuff in the makefile to remove the line if > ENABLE_VCONSOLE isn't set. I don't like this either, it's ugly.
Ewwww, this does indeed all sound ugly. >> So if you have no idea how to make that rule be generated only if >> ENABLE_VCONSOLE is set by configure, then we probably should take my >> patch below. > Your patch seems far better than the options above, but I think it > needs a dracut patch to make sure the new rules file gets in the > initrd too, or it won't work. I will push the patch to systemd and let Harald know. I'm not really familiar with dracut.. Thanks David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
