On Thursday 06 November 2014 at 11:02:44, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi Ray > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:40 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ray Strode <halfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> So if you have no idea how to make that rule be generated only if > >>> ENABLE_VCONSOLE is set by configure, then we probably should take my > >>> patch below. > >> Your patch seems far better than the options above, but I think it > >> needs a dracut patch to make sure the new rules file gets in the > >> initrd too, or it won't work. > > > > I will push the patch to systemd and let Harald know. I'm not really > > familiar with dracut.. > > Pushed.
Isn't it ugly to re-runn systemd-vconsole-setup straight from an udev rule? I mean, udev has a tendency to kill long-running RUN processes, and I've seen systemd-vconsole-setup.service to take >5 seconds on some systems... Also, these additional systemd-vconsole-setup instances aren't supervised by systemd... -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
