On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > > Yeah, I think we should just suggest people to rename files they want > to disable. We should probably recommend a convention though, for > example ".disabled" as suffix. We should recommend the convention > simply because in some cases we want the option to place multiple file > types the same dir, and we need to make sure that whatever people > rename things to doesn't turn it into something we might consider a > valid file name later on again. > > I am tempted to just say ".disabled" as suffix is the easiest option, > but maybe somebody has better ideas?
How about ignoring the file if <fullname>.masked exists? touch/rm is a bit easier than renaming. Was thinking earlier about suggesting that for generators (which can't really be renamed). -- Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
