"fdb" and "entry" association is non-googlable, but bridgeFDB is. It will get you exactly where you want.
-----Original Message----- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 12:20 AM To: Lennart Poettering Cc: Rauta, Alin; Kinsella, Ray; 'systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org' Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 12.12.14 09:07, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote: > > > What do you think about the following transformations: > > > > [FDBEntry] =====> [FDBNeigh] > > We try to avoid acronyms and abbreviations unless they are very widely > established. Hence I am not convinced "Neigh" is something we should > use. > > Given that "fdb" and "entry" are commonly used I think [FDBEntry] > would be fine. I don't think it's widely established. E.g. compared to "VLAN", it certainly isn't. "FDB" is also pretty much non-googlable. "ForwardingDatabase" is imho much nicer and easier to search for. Also, it's not like you type those things by hand every day, so saving a few characters should not be a consideration. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
