On 28 January 2015 at 15:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 03:21:27PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> On 28 January 2015 at 14:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:22:54PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > From 104cf82ba28941e907f277a713f834ceb3d909f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > > From: Didier Roche <didro...@ubuntu.com> >> > > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:40:52 +0100 >> > > Subject: [PATCH 06/12] Support cancellation of fsck in progress >> > > >> > > Grab in fsckd plymouth watch key for C or c, and propagate this cancel >> > > request >> > > to systemd-fsck which will terminate fsck. >> > Could we bind to ^c or if this is not possible, "three c's in three >> > seconds" instead? I'm worried that before you could press anything to >> > little >> > effect in plymouth, and now a single key will have significant >> > consequences. >> > >> >> >> Hm? an interactive message with key-binding is usually shown and then >> plymouth reacts to such a key prompt. >> This is how it has always worked on plymouth prompts since forever... >> thus this would not be a surprise to most plymouth users (~ 5+ years >> by now?!) >> Doing it otherwise, will, on the contrary, impede user experience. > If you say so. I have never interacted with plymouth except to press ESC. > I'll have to give this a try.
Actually it's not ESC button, but rather any escape sequence will drop into messages mode. That is shift, ctrl, alt, Fn, all of them. Thus I don't think ^c binding is actually available to plymouth clients. But my plymouth knowledge is rusty. -- Regards, Dimitri. Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
