On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 29.01.15 15:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:56:30AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Updated patch which the correct version information. > > > > > > Applied. > > > > Hm, I think this was an unintentional ABI break. udev_queue_flush @@ > > LIBUDEV_183 > > was removed, udev_queue_flush @@ LIBUDEV_215 was added. The linker cannot > > know > > that this is the same symbol. > > Hmm can you elaborate on this? I missing the context? Is there > something to fix here? For two releases systemd had a symbol, which then got removed. Anyone compiling during that time and using it, would get a crashing binary after installing systemd from the latest version.
Although this happened a while ago and nobody complained suggests that there were few users, and any there were got recompiled anyway. My reason for mentioning this is: - to raise the problem should a similar situation come up again - to ask whether we can fix it anyway. Can we add udev_queue_flush @@ LIBUDEV_183 back, without removing udev_queue_flush @@ LIBUDEV_215? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
