On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Thu, 29.01.15 15:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:56:30AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Updated patch which the correct version information.
>> > >
>> > > Applied.
>> >
>> > Hm, I think this was an unintentional ABI break. udev_queue_flush @@ 
>> > LIBUDEV_183
>> > was removed, udev_queue_flush @@ LIBUDEV_215 was added. The linker cannot 
>> > know
>> > that this is the same symbol.
>>
>> Hmm can you elaborate on this? I missing the context? Is there
>> something to fix here?
> For two releases systemd had a symbol, which then got removed.
> Anyone compiling during that time and using it, would get a crashing
> binary after installing systemd from the latest version.
>
> Although this happened a while ago and nobody complained suggests
> that there were few users, and any there were got recompiled anyway.

There should be no external users of these symbols, they were just
exported for consistency.

Kay
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to