Hello, >> So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains >> >> After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target >> >> this "after" does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required >> by >> multi-user.target can already be started when some jobs from >> basic.target >> have not been started??? > > Correct. > ... > What is the the > problem you are trying to solve by "implementing a new 'intermediate' > runlevel" ?
I want a program to be run at boot time without any other systemd services starting concurrently. The program needs the services from basic.target and may influence everything in multi-user.target and later targets, so I guess that between basic.target and multi-user.target is a good time for execution of the program. I hoped that this can be achieved by simply defining a new target, setting after basic.target dependencies for it and changing the dependencies of multi-user.target from basic.target to my new target. This would not require me too know anything about the specific services in basic.target and multi-user.target . Regards Christoph Regards Christoph _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
