On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Christoph Pleger <christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > Hello, > >>> So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains >>> >>> After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target >>> >>> this "after" does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required >>> by >>> multi-user.target can already be started when some jobs from >>> basic.target >>> have not been started??? >>> >> >> After means exactly what it says - multi-user.target waits for all >> units listed in After line. It does not imply anything about relative >> ordering of those units. Unless they have other dependencies all of >> them will (attempted to) be started in parallel. > > Then, I still do not understand why my definition of a new target did not > work. What is the difference between multi-user.target waiting for > basic.target on the one hand and new.target waiting for basic.target and > multi-user.target waiting for new.target on the other hand, aside from > that one intermediate step? >
Everything else that is ordered before multi-user.target is started concurrently with your new.target. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
