Am 19.03.2015 um 18:00 schrieb Uoti Urpala:
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:41 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
The summary of my reply was "What you probably want, is hook into
basic.target or sysinit.target, use DefaultDependencies=no, and
specify the dependencies/orderings explicitly."

Apparently, this didn't stick.

The reality is, this question comes again and again; and the very fact
that we had to add *-pre.target to allow such kind of ordering
dependencies shows that the problem is real.

What exactly is your definition of "this question" and "the problem"? I
don't see any natural definition that would equally apply to what the
original poster was trying to do and things like local-fs-pre.target

that you have sometimes things where you want to make sure a specific order and say: "don't start my target until basic target is started and don't start anything until all the services of my target are up"

it would make ordering way easier and give a ton of flexibility for unit-writers (which are not only distributions but end-users/admins with very specific environments)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to