Hi Michael, >>>>>>>> On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Dimitri, > >>>>> Just tell patch or git to skip the hunks modifying ids-update.pl and >>>>> sdio.ids. Problem solved. >>>> >>>> I'll apply the patch, but with a slightly different motivation. >>>> >>>> [L]GPL requires commercial entities distributing a modified version of >>>> the program to provide full source in the preferred form for modification, >>>> including all scripts used for building. This includes sdio.ids and >>>> ids-update.pl. We should make it easy to follow the our licensing, so >>>> we should include those files in our tarball to make it directly >>>> redistributable. >>> >>> that is just making stuff up. >> Where was I wrong? >> >>> Are you now also including usb.ids? >> We probably should >> > > Right, we should include all source files, not only the generated files.
is this turning in Freaky Friday now? Can we please be real for a bit. You do realize that I did not put a copyright header on top of sdio.ids. In addition this information will be most likely considered a not copyrightable piece of source anyway. If we assume that this is non-copyrightable, then how can you apply a copyleft license to it? And honestly I rather take sdio.ids file out of systemd.git and maintain it outside if we start making these weird claims. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel