2015-03-20 6:40 GMT+01:00 Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>: > Hi Michael, > >>>>>>>>> On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Dimitri, >> >>>>>> Just tell patch or git to skip the hunks modifying ids-update.pl and >>>>>> sdio.ids. Problem solved. >>>>> >>>>> I'll apply the patch, but with a slightly different motivation. >>>>> >>>>> [L]GPL requires commercial entities distributing a modified version of >>>>> the program to provide full source in the preferred form for modification, >>>>> including all scripts used for building. This includes sdio.ids and >>>>> ids-update.pl. We should make it easy to follow the our licensing, so >>>>> we should include those files in our tarball to make it directly >>>>> redistributable. >>>> >>>> that is just making stuff up. >>> Where was I wrong? >>> >>>> Are you now also including usb.ids? >>> We probably should >>> >> >> Right, we should include all source files, not only the generated files. > > is this turning in Freaky Friday now? Can we please be real for a bit. > > You do realize that I did not put a copyright header on top of sdio.ids. In > addition this information will be most likely considered a not copyrightable > piece of source anyway. If we assume that this is non-copyrightable, then how > can you apply a copyleft license to it?
Are you saying https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/v2.2/pci.ids is wrong in adding a license header? What is the preferred form of modification? The hwdb files or the .ids files? Where do users add new entries: to the hwdb files or the .ids files? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
