On Wed, 13.05.15 15:21, jsyna...@redhat.com (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
> From: Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com>
Hmm, do we really need two options for this? I mean, since -e would
only ever be combined with start, and -d only with stop it could as
well be a single option that works for both?
Also, I am tempted to say that this should be reversed: instead of
making this options that alter start/stop behaviour, it should be
options that alter enable/disable behaviour, and actually take into
account the precise units that were enabled, including everything
referenced in the [Install] section of the unit files.
hence, I think I would prefer something like this instead:
systemctl enable --now foobar.service
systemctl disable --now foobar.service
Where "--now" simply means that the service shall be started after
enabling, and stopped after disabling.
Does this make sense?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
