Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> writes: > On Wed, 13.05.15 15:21, jsyna...@redhat.com (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> From: Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> > > Hmm, do we really need two options for this? I mean, since -e would > only ever be combined with start, and -d only with stop it could as > well be a single option that works for both?
Makes sense. I actually wanted to implement the one argument version first, but then decided to make it more explicit. Will fix. > Also, I am tempted to say that this should be reversed: instead of > making this options that alter start/stop behaviour, it should be > options that alter enable/disable behaviour, and actually take into > account the precise units that were enabled, including everything > referenced in the [Install] section of the unit files. > > hence, I think I would prefer something like this instead: > > systemctl enable --now foobar.service > systemctl disable --now foobar.service > > Where "--now" simply means that the service shall be started after > enabling, and stopped after disabling. > > Does this make sense? Yes, it does. I'll rewrite the patch. Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
