On Fri, 29.05.15 16:30, Harald Hoyer ([email protected]) wrote: > Am 29.05.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > On Fri, 29.05.15 12:17, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> From: Harald Hoyer <[email protected]> > >> > >> If cryptsetup is called with a source device as argv[3], then craft the > >> ID for the password agent with a unique device path. > >> > >> If possible "/dev/block/<maj>:<min>" is used, otherwise the original > >> argv[3] is used. > > > > Why use the major/minor numebrs here? Why isn't the original device > > name good enough? > > Don't we want a kind of unique ID?
But the original device path is already unique? I mean, it's a path in the file heirarchy, that already makes it unique. Or what do you mean by "unique"? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
