Am 29.05.2015 um 16:38 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Fri, 29.05.15 16:30, Harald Hoyer ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Am 29.05.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Lennart Poettering: >>> On Fri, 29.05.15 12:17, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: >>> >>>> From: Harald Hoyer <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> If cryptsetup is called with a source device as argv[3], then craft the >>>> ID for the password agent with a unique device path. >>>> >>>> If possible "/dev/block/<maj>:<min>" is used, otherwise the original >>>> argv[3] is used. >>> >>> Why use the major/minor numebrs here? Why isn't the original device >>> name good enough? >> >> Don't we want a kind of unique ID? > > But the original device path is already unique? I mean, it's a path in > the file heirarchy, that already makes it unique. > > Or what do you mean by "unique"? > > Lennart >
I was more thinking about symlinks pointing to the same device. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
