В Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:16:09 +0200 Igor Bukanov <i...@mir2.org> пишет:
> On 14 June 2015 at 12:10, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not really. systemctl enable|disable|is-enabled explicitly work on > > links defined by [Install] section only. > > This is not true. According to systemctl is-enabled man page for > services without [Install] the command should succeed and print > static, not fail with an error message. It's not what you said originally :) > when I expected that the command succeeds and prints enabled-runtime > as the unit was enabled through a target file So it can be discussed what should be returned in this case, but in any case "systemctl is-enabled" is not expected to return "enabled-runtime" here. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
