В Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:36:39 +0200 Igor Bukanov <i...@mir2.org> пишет:
> On 14 June 2015 at 12:22, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So it can be discussed what should be returned in this case, but in any > > case "systemctl is-enabled" is not expected to return "enabled-runtime" > > here. > > Indeed, I see that it should not be `enabled-runtime"` as the unit > does not contain [Install]. > > Still why systemctl does not return `static` in this case but fails > with an error message? I also see that systemctl fails with the same > error message for generated units that are linked via .wants under > /run/systemd/generator when my expectation is that the command should > succeed and print `linked-runtime`. Currently generator paths are explicitly excluded from systemctl operations. I think systemd should distinguish between runtime and generators. One reason is, generated units are meant to be "enabled" by definition - they are usually created to be included in transaction. So if something should be returned it should be "generated"; not sure which qualifications make sense here. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
