On Tue, 22.09.15 11:41, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > One more addendum to the original mail: > > > > We already declared the interface "obsolete" in the docs, which makes > > me particularly keen on dropping it... > > I guess one thing is that even if support for /dev/intctl in systemd, > it is an optional unit file, so libvirt probably needs to deal with > the SIGRTMIN+4 stuff anyway, for case where the person building > the container has that unit file disabled. So from that POV, deleting > it won't make current situation that much worse.
Also, we support builds with all legacy cruft disabled, which is something where inictl currently is not disabled, but if we kept it should really be disable under... So I figure even if we keep the general support in this is not an interface you can rely on... To make the SIGRTMIN+4 reliable all you need to do is check first if /run/systemd/system/ exists. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
