On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 22.09.15 11:41, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > One more addendum to the original mail: > > > > > > We already declared the interface "obsolete" in the docs, which makes > > > me particularly keen on dropping it... > > > > I guess one thing is that even if support for /dev/intctl in systemd, > > it is an optional unit file, so libvirt probably needs to deal with > > the SIGRTMIN+4 stuff anyway, for case where the person building > > the container has that unit file disabled. So from that POV, deleting > > it won't make current situation that much worse. > > Also, we support builds with all legacy cruft disabled, which is > something where inictl currently is not disabled, but if we kept it > should really be disable under... So I figure even if we keep the > general support in this is not an interface you can rely on... > > To make the SIGRTMIN+4 reliable all you need to do is check first if > /run/systemd/system/ exists.
Ok, that's easy enough. So no objection from libvirt if you remove /dev/initctl in future releases Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
