Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 11/11/15 13:38: >>> > > systemd-machine (machined,nspawn,importd) >> > >> > We call that package "systemd-container", but it has exactly those, so >> > "check". > I think we (Fedora) should follow this, for inter-distro consistency.
I prefer that name to systemd-nspawn. As Lennart's original comment on the systemd-machine package name suggestion was "the name of the daemon doesn't matter", I'd argue that the name of the binary also doesn't matter too much! After all, the "nspawn" itself doesn't mean anything unless you know what nspawn is, and if you know what it is, then you know what a container is, so the name systemd-container makes sense there. So +1 from me for that name as a general recommendation. Col -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel