Lennart Poettering [2015-11-12 9:59 +0100]: > THere's no point in shipping the non-binary version of the hwdb. The > hwdb isn't a cache, it's a compiled version of the hwdb, and you don't > the sources around for this.
Won't you need it for udevadm hwdb --update, after you add a new hwdb.d/ file? Or can we now have multiple compiled dbs, one shipped by the package and one built dynamically by hwdb --update? Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
