On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 12:44 PM Jérémy Rosen <jeremy.ro...@smile.fr> wrote: > > The short answer is that Requires without after makes little sense, > since you can't reliably know if your dependency is here without it > (if it fails at startup, you might or might not be started, depending > on the startup order systemd chooses)
According to the docs that one doesn't depend on ordering. See how complicated this is? ;) > If one of the other units fails to activate, and an ordering dependency > After= on the failing unit is set, this unit will not be started. > however, for backward compatibility reasons, those two will most > likely stay separate. > > I think a bigger warning in the docs that those two should usually > be used together would be welcomed. IMO docs are not a solution, especially long-term. Greetings, Olaf _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
