> On Mar 18, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > Am 18.03.19 um 19:27 schrieb Felipe Gasper: >> I’m noticing that ExecStop handlers execute not merely as a means for >> systemd to stop a Service but also when that Service’s main process receives >> SIGTERM. >> >> The documentation (systemd.service) says that ExecStop commands are how >> systemd stops the service; it’s not at all intuitive from that, IMO, that >> these would also run when something _else_ stops the service. >> >> Am I missing something in the documentation, or is this a bug? >> >> I’m running release 219. > > 219 sounds like CentOS/RHEL 7 > > at least httpd has a patch for "type=notify" which also results in > "apachectl graceful" showing systemd service reload other than on > unpatched httpd > > so i guess that behavior has something to to with direct support of > systemd and type=notify
Yeah, I’m on CentOS 7. Are you saying that this is a bug that later systemd releases have fixed? -FG _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
