Am 18.03.19 um 20:23 schrieb Felipe Gasper: >> On Mar 18, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> Am 18.03.19 um 19:27 schrieb Felipe Gasper: >>> I’m noticing that ExecStop handlers execute not merely as a means for >>> systemd to stop a Service but also when that Service’s main process >>> receives SIGTERM. >>> >>> The documentation (systemd.service) says that ExecStop commands are how >>> systemd stops the service; it’s not at all intuitive from that, IMO, that >>> these would also run when something _else_ stops the service. >>> >>> Am I missing something in the documentation, or is this a bug? >>> >>> I’m running release 219. >> >> 219 sounds like CentOS/RHEL 7 >> >> at least httpd has a patch for "type=notify" which also results in >> "apachectl graceful" showing systemd service reload other than on >> unpatched httpd >> >> so i guess that behavior has something to to with direct support of >> systemd and type=notify > > Yeah, I’m on CentOS 7. > > Are you saying that this is a bug that later systemd releases have fixed?
no, i try to explain the behavior from my expierience and won't call it a bug at all _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
