On Fr, 27.09.19 19:26, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:

> > That's the main problem. Only two of my several still-reasonably-modern
> > x64 machines have TPMs, and one of them is TPM 1.2 which requires the
> > completely unmaintained Trousers stack.
>
> As a side topic for systemd-homed, I kind of wish Linux had some actual
> daemon that would take care of TPM stuff, like providing an API to
> seal

A small clarification: systemd-homed does not interface with the
TPM. I am pretty sure it shouldn't. I think linking your OS storage to
the TPM makes sense, but the user's data store not so much.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to