>...and does it better.
That's a matter of opinion. I preferred the old list, and I currently spend
very little time on the T&F News website because of the web-based format. I
can't stand all that clicking forward and backward and (sometimes slow) loading
of pages that involves. E-mail is quicker, easier, and cleaner.
Kurt Bray
"Bob Hersh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To
Sent by: "Roger Ruth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
.uoregon.edu t-and-f@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject
Re: t-and-f: Why 557?
05/24/2006 06:59 AM
Please respond to
"Bob Hersh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I think the simplest answer to the question why (only) 557 is that
most of us have migrated over to the Track and Field News Message
Board, which really satisfies every need that the t-and-f listserv
ever did, does more, and does it better.
The real question is why the 557 of us are still here, and in my case
inertia is part of the answer, the other part being that as long as
there are a few die-hards like Roger who post valuable things here and
not on the T&FN site, I have a reason to stick around.
Bob H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (list-related)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (general correspondence)
========================================================================================================================
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of Beckman Coulter, Inc. It is intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this
message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
========================================================================================================================
