Would that really be enough of a reason for such a merger not to go ahead? Sure, maybe only one national GSM carrier, but there would still be several choices in carrier for your cellphone services. I doubt that the technology itself would be a large enough reason for the DoJ not to let that one through.
--mco On Jul 5, 2005, at 13:32, edwardp1965 wrote: > --- In [email protected], "nokiaphonenut" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd say Cingular is the only potential buyer. They're already > GSM, as > > is T-Mobile. But T-M may only have it's customer base as an asset > > Cingular is interested in. Verizon is CDMA and does not look to be > > interested in switching to GSM, so all that equipment would be > surplus > > to Verizon (Sprint and Nextel same thing). > > > > Just my thoughts... > > NPN > > Will not happen. It would create a monopoly for GSM services, meaning > that would leave the U.S. with only one national GSM carrier. > > > > > > > > - - - - > > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > Visit your group "T-Mobile-US" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > - - - - Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/T-Mobile-US/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
