Hi All, Thanks for the speedy answers!
It is very unlikely KDE (whatever version) will become central part of my system, because it is not focused neither on speed nor on simplicity. I include only base packages (qt4, kdelibs) which are supposed to be needed by graphical packages I use (openoffice.org among others). Regarding the original question I managed to reproduce errors and solution for 8.0 trunk rev30092. Putting pkg_qt4.conf with the already mentioned extra lines (if pkg_installed dbus ..) in my target folder qt4 compiled with QtDbus (needed by kdelibs). Some (at least for me) new issues: 1) in trunk 8.0 with kde4 the patch for kde3 in 'target/desktop' does not work (I guess the patch for kdebase is also obsolate, but it is not part of my target) anymore 2) It may sound crazy, but apparently (reproduced twice) automoc4 and phonon (both needed by kdelibs) do required to find the kde4 folder structure already there prior to building any of the kde4 packs. After the folder structure is created both packs build happily. Since automoc4 is addressing exclusively kde4, we can assume that if automoc4 is building, some of the kde4 packs will follow. So should we include some 'hookadd preconf ...' in automoc4.conf in order to create folder structure before effective configuring automoc4? Is this the way it works? or patching dritree (not very attractive way)? Just a general question: are the findings of the T2 community about needed extra patches and configs communicated somehow to the authors of the given package so that they may correct errors and T2 may not need those patches anymore? best regards, helasz PS: I knew about the unhappy release of kde4, but I think the team of KDE more than ever is doing its best to bring back everything working, and it will not take more than a couple of months. ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
