Hi Adam, Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2008, 15:42 +0000 schrieb Adam Stirk: > Rene, > > > > Is there a reason for using udev v120 instead of udev v130? As I’ve > been looking at my problem of my 5 NIC’s not persisting their name > between reboots and I would like to work on patching this in the T2 > environment. If I do this I would like to upgrade to udev v130 at the > same time, but would like to know what I’m letting myself in for > before I start.
there is already an updated udev v130 on my system, but I wanted to check with a clean rebuild first. The main problem is the initrd usage, we statically link udev apps with dietlibc. But we also need the udev shared libraries for other packages, like hal. Just updating to v130 will not work, some patches do no longer apply, and shared library build is broken then. Michael ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
