Hi Douglas, Thank you for the patch! I applied it with some cleanups:
> On Jan 23, 2024, at 17:00, Douglas Andreani <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- ./package/graphic/raylib/raylib.cache 1969-12-31 21:00:00.000000000 > -0300 > +++ ./package/graphic/raylib/raylib.cache 2024-01-23 12:56:13.316203353 > -0300 > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > + > +[TIMESTAMP] 1706025287 Tue Jan 23 12:54:47 2024 > +[BUILDTIME] 18 (9) > +[SIZE] 3.05 MB, 14 files > + > +[DEP] gzip Very short .cache, no idea what happened, but could be cross builds which do not yet gather all deps, I aded my test build's .cache > +[L] Unknown > +[C] base/x11 > +[F] CROSS > +[S] Stable Added a newline, to match our style. License should not be unknown though. Maybe you can send an follow up patch? ;-) > +[V] 5.0 > +[P] X -----5---9 130.000 > + > +[O] runzig=0 > + > +[D] 74d3640114035c65e5f1b2ce406e94e3430cb18334bdd176c69004b9 5.0.tar.gz > https://github.com/raysan5/raylib/archive/refs/tags/ We can really not download number only tars like that. They would collide with all other number only tars. I therefore edited it in the way we always carefully craft GitHub downloads to store a file including the package name. Thanks again! René -- ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
