Hi,
On Feb 2, 2024, at 01:40, Douglas Andreani <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I am getting the hang of this patches yet.
>
> Regarding the license. I've tried to use ZLIB like described, but the
> paranoid keep preventing me from continuing.
We check that to avoid typos or just using random gibberish. The known licenses
are in:
misc/share/REGISTER
We certainly can add more, and it was recently suggested to transition to SPDX
or so, modern naming:
https://github.com/rxrbln/t2sde/issues/142
When we did the license tags some 25 years we mostly classified BSD vs GPL or
MT and as zlib was
none of them we just used “OpenSource” for anything else.
But I guess it is time to specifically add the zlib license to the registry,
too.
We could also improve the diagnostic to point new developers to the
misc/share/REGISTER file.
Patches welcome!
René
> Get BlueMail for Android <https://bluemail.me/>
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 18:39, "René Rebe" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Douglas,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! I applied it with some cleanups:
>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2024, at 17:00, Douglas Andreani <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> --- ./package/graphic/raylib/raylib.cache 1969-12-31
>>> 21:00:00.000000000 -0300
>>> +++ ./package/graphic/raylib/raylib.cache 2024-01-23
>>> 12:56:13.316203353 -0300
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>> +
>>> +[TIMESTAMP] 1706025287 Tue Jan 23 12:54:47 2024
>>> +[BUILDTIME] 18 (9)
>>> +[SIZE] 3.05 MB, 14 files
>>> +
>>> +[DEP] gzip
>>
>> Very short .cache, no idea what happened, but could be cross builds which do
>> not yet
>> gather all deps, I aded my test build's .cache
>>
>>> +[L] Unknown
>>> +[C] base/x11
>>> +[F] CROSS
>>> +[S] Stable
>>
>> Added a newline, to match our style. License should not be unknown though.
>> Maybe you can send an follow up patch? ;-)
>>
>>> +[V] 5.0
>>> +[P] X -----5---9 130.000
>>> +
>>> +[O] runzig=0
>>> +
>>> +[D] 74d3640114035c65e5f1b2ce406e94e3430cb18334bdd176c69004b9 5.0.tar.gz
>>> https://github.com/raysan5/raylib/archive/refs/tags/
>>
>> We can really not download number only tars like that. They would collide
>> with all other number only tars.
>> I therefore edited it in the way we always carefully craft GitHub downloads
>> to store a file including the package name.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> René
>>
>> --
>> ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com
>>
--
ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
